2288: Endangered Fish Recovery Programs Improvement Act of 2010 2018: The Clean Water Cooperative Federalism Act of 2011 Colorado Wyoming Cooperative Water Supply Project.Colorado Water Quality Control Commission.Colorado River Water Conservation District.Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment.Central Colorado Water Conservancy District.Arapahoe County Water and Wastewater Authority.
51st State Initiative (North Colorado Secession).The district is charging the $3-a-month stormwater fee to most residences and for each 2,500 square feet of impervious surfaces to businesses and other property owners.Ģ007 Shortage Sharing Agreement Animas River Watershed Arkansas Basin Blue River Watershed Bureau of Reclamation Colorado-Big Thompson Project Colorado River Basin Colorado River Compact Colorado Water Plan Conservation CWCB Denver Basin Aquifer System Denver Water Dolores River Watershed Drought Contingency Plans (DCP) Education Endangered/Threatened Species Energy Policy Environmental Protection Agency Fountain Creek Fryingpan-Arkansas Project Fryingpan Watershed General Interest Green River Basin Groundwater Gunnison River Basin Hydroelectric/Hydropower IBCC - Basin Roundtables Instream flow Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District Nuclear Oil and Methane Gas Pipeline Projects Poudre River Watershed Prior appropriation Restoration/reclamation Rio Grande Basin Roaring Fork Watershed San Juan Basin South Platte Basin Stormwater Transmountain/transbasin diversions Uncategorized Wastewater Water Education Colorado Water Law Water Pollution Water Treatment Whitewater Yampa River Basin Coyote Gulch Archives The drainage district is hoping to collect $2.77 million this year for projects within its 90-square-mile area, which includes the most densely populated areas north of the Colorado River. That job will fall to another judge after Bottger’s Aug. He pointed to two Colorado Supreme Court cases that stood for the proposition that a charge for storm-drainage services “is in the nature of a fee.”īottger’s rejection of the preliminary injunction is a setback for the county and chamber, but doesn’t decide the actual case. The charge, meanwhile, is “unfair and we firmly believe it definitely hurts the business community,” Schwenke said.īottger found that the county and chamber failed to demonstrate a reasonable probability of success with their contention that the charge was a tax. “We still fully believe it is a tax and not a fee.” The chamber is “fully committed to moving forward,” said Diane Schwenke, president and CEO.
There have been “more positive conversations” recently with the drainage district, McInnis said. There has been some improvement on the district with a contested seat having been decided by an election earlier this spring and greater interest in discussing issues around the valley, McInnis said. “We’ve taken that (the charge) was ill-timed and that the governance has to change,” McInnis said. No one disputes that the Grand Valley needs to deal with stormwater, said Mesa County Commissioner Scott McInnis.
The need for the projects that the district is planning hasn’t lessened either, Ryan said.Ĭounty and chamber officials said they were disappointed, but not deterred. The district has an obligation to those who already have paid the fee to collect from those who haven’t, Ryan said. The drainage district board had approved printing and mailing bills to delinquent property owners earlier Tuesday morning, said district General Manager Tim Ryan. For the same reasons, the equities weigh in favor of denying the injunction.” “Thus, an injunction will more likely disserve than serve the public interest. “Collection of the fee will allow (the drainage district) to better fulfill its statutory obligations to the businesses and residences it serves in the Grand Valley,” Bottger wrote in a 14-page opinion in a case in which the question of whether the charge is a tax or fee is central. Mesa County District Court Judge David Bottger rejected a request by Mesa County and the Grand Junction Area Chamber of Commerce for a preliminary injunction that would have halted the district from collecting the charge, which for most residents is $36 a year. Bicycling the Colorado National Monument, Grand Valley in the distance via įrom The Grand Junction Daily Sentinel (Gary Harmon):Ī second round of invoices will go out in early August from the Grand Valley Drainage District to residents and businesses that have yet to pay their bills for the handling of stormwater - a charge that got a boost Tuesday from a court ruling.
0 kommentar(er)
